The FSA Spy market buzz – 11 April 2025
Lazard actively looks at Next Gen; Goldman Sachs loves active in small places; Janus Henderson is reassuring; Private equity’s overflowing war chest; Jevons Paradox; Hamlet’s wisdom and much more.
HEAD-TO-HEAD: Aviva vs GAM
FSA compares the Aviva Investors – Global Convertibles Absolute Return Fund with the GAM Multibond Absolute Return Bond Fund.
The Aviva fund charges the OCF of 0.96%, while the GAM fund charges 1.69%.
“GAM generally tends to have higher fees across all their products,” Douali said. The relative size of the two teams can provide some rationale for the higher fees. While the Aviva team consists essentially of two people, the GAM team is much larger, and the investors pay, in principle, for the breadth and depth of the research it provides.
Related Stories
Promoted Content
-
Impact opportunities: investing to limit biodiversity loss
-
China’s post-pandemic growth gathers pace
-
Dynamism is the name of the game for this global macro strategy
-
Step up your portfolio by doubling down on sectors set for long-term growth
-
How can a sustainable approach also ensure you don’t compromise performance?
-
Investors turn to real estate for alternative income
-
Taking a thematic approach to harness disruption
-
The year of living dangerously for income investors
-
M&G Episode Macro shines after tough year
-
Unmasking the dividend opportunity
