The FSA Spy market buzz – 1 November 2024
Battleshares’ old versus new, Goldman Sachs’ Cassandra warning, Hong Kong property’s negative equity woes, Ninety One’s trillion-dollar question, Contrarian alert from CB, Lists and much more.
HEAD-TO-HEAD: Aviva vs GAM
FSA compares the Aviva Investors – Global Convertibles Absolute Return Fund with the GAM Multibond Absolute Return Bond Fund.
The Aviva fund charges the OCF of 0.96%, while the GAM fund charges 1.69%.
“GAM generally tends to have higher fees across all their products,” Douali said. The relative size of the two teams can provide some rationale for the higher fees. While the Aviva team consists essentially of two people, the GAM team is much larger, and the investors pay, in principle, for the breadth and depth of the research it provides.
Related Stories
Promoted Content
-
Investors turn to real estate for alternative income
-
The future of mobility
-
M&G Episode Macro shines after tough year
-
Federated Hermes SDG Engagement Equity: 2021 H1 Report
-
Accessing Asian 5G innovation: three key portfolio themes
-
How can a sustainable approach also ensure you don’t compromise performance?
-
Tech WELLcovered | Work reimagined
-
Smartphones on wheels
-
Who’s afraid of higher interest rates?
-
Taking a thematic approach to harness disruption
