The FSA Spy market buzz – 1 November 2024
Battleshares’ old versus new, Goldman Sachs’ Cassandra warning, Hong Kong property’s negative equity woes, Ninety One’s trillion-dollar question, Contrarian alert from CB, Lists and much more.
“Both funds have done a very good job of tracking their indices,” Lamont said.
However, European investors might notice a difference between the daily returns of the fund NAVs and the daily closing values of the underlying indices.
The NAV of the funds is priced daily at midday UK time – eight hours behind Japan. It reflects market events that have transpired since the close of the Japanese stock market.
Since the benchmarks of the two funds make no such adjustments, it is a source of both tracking difference and tracking error. (The tracking difference is the daily difference of returns between a fund and its benchmark, while the tracking error is the volatility of tracking differences).
“In this case with Japan, because of the time difference of the underlying market, it is difficult for an analyst to directly compare the tracking performance,” Lamont said. “Therefore, we are not able to make cohesive judgement on that.”
The tracking error of the iShares fund is 2.11, compared to 2.86 of the Vanguard fund.
Share class D of the iShares product has returned 14.06% over the past three years, Lamont said, adding it performed “admirably when compared with its surviving category peers”.
Vanguard has generated a return of 13.77% over the same period.
Battleshares’ old versus new, Goldman Sachs’ Cassandra warning, Hong Kong property’s negative equity woes, Ninety One’s trillion-dollar question, Contrarian alert from CB, Lists and much more.
Part of the Mark Allen Group.