The FSA Spy market buzz – 22 November 2024
Dimensional excludes the Middle Kingdom; JP Morgan’s optimistic outlook; Household wealth is rocketing; Schroders is thinking about privates; Ninety One’s pithy AI; German woes and much more.
HEAD-TO-HEAD: Fidelity vs Pinebridge
FSA compares two Greater China equity products: the Fidelity Greater China Fund and the Pinebridge Greater China Equity Fund.
Fees
“The fees on both products are a little high,” said Ng.
The Fidelity fund’s ongoing charges figure (OCF) is 1.95%, and the OCF for the Pinebridge fund is even steeper at 2.10%.
Yet, the managers of Greater China equities funds seem able to charge high rates, and compared with the median of 1.93% for the sector, the OCFs of the Fidelity and Pinebidge funds are not egregious.
For instance, several funds charge more than 3.00%, and one fund demands as much 3.50%.
Related Stories
Promoted Content
-
Driving decarbonisation: how to access new forms of alpha
-
Taking a thematic approach to harness disruption
-
Riding the wave of alternative income amongst HNWIs in APAC
-
Thematic investment series: Innovative transformation cuts across “old” and “new” economy companies
-
Impact opportunities: investing to limit biodiversity loss
-
Tap into Japan’s post-pandemic growth trends
-
Turning environmental hopes into investment reality
-
Nuveen broadens income sources via private capital and real assets
-
Dynamism is the name of the game for this global macro strategy
-
How ETFs offer an active way to drive sustainable returns
