The FSA Spy market buzz – 16 May 2025
Playing monopoly with ETFs; Eastspring is worrying about loss aversion; Family office explosion; SGX wants more action; The Fear and Greed Index; Retail investors plough on; Deepfake fraud and much more.
HEAD-TO-HEAD: China Merchants versus Penghua
FSA compares two China onshore fixed income products: the CMF Industrial Bond A Fund and the Penghua Industrial Bond Fund.
Fees
The fees for the funds are both at the median level in the “Normal Bond” category. The CMF fund charges a management fee of 0.7% per annum and a custodian fee of 0.2% per annum; the Penghua product charges an annual management fee of 0.6% and a custodian fee of 0.2%.
The total expense ratios of the CMF fund and Penghua fund in 2020 were 0.92% and 0.83% respectively, with both sitting in the middle quintile among their peers, according to Wu.
Related Stories
Promoted Content
-
Dynamism is the name of the game for this global macro strategy
-
Don’t get left behind in fixed income
-
Nuveen broadens income sources via private capital and real assets
-
Accessing Asian 5G innovation: three key portfolio themes
-
Conditions in the high yield market
-
The future of mobility
-
Impact opportunities: investing to limit biodiversity loss
-
From “FAANG” to “MAMAA” to “Magnificent 7” – what’s in a name?
-
Driving decarbonisation: how to access new forms of alpha
-
China bonds: plugging the yield gap
