The FSA Spy market buzz – 30 May 2025
Korean AI-driven investing, The wisdom of Nvidia, Goldman Sachs and active good news, The sheer size of the top ten, Ferris Bueller and Trump’s tariffs, A trillion here - a trillion there, and much more.
HEAD-TO-HEAD: Capital Group versus Franklin Templeton
FSA compares two flexible global fixed income products: The Capital Group Global High Income Opportunities Fund and the Templeton Global Bond Fund.
Fees
The clean share class of the Capital Group fund has ongoing charges (OCF) of .90%, while the Templeton fund’s OCF is 1.09%, according to Ge.
Both funds are cheaper than their peers, although the Capital Group fund is more competitively priced than the Templeton option. The peer median of flexible global fixed income funds is 1.34%, Ge said.
Related Stories
Promoted Content
-
How can a sustainable approach also ensure you don’t compromise performance?
-
Ninety One: Finding opportunities in times of change
-
From “FAANG” to “MAMAA” to “Magnificent 7” – what’s in a name?
-
M&G Episode Macro shines after tough year
-
Thematic investment series: Innovative transformation cuts across “old” and “new” economy companies
-
Accessing Asian 5G innovation: three key portfolio themes
-
Exciting opportunities in AI & Robotics outside of traditional tech
-
Riding the wave of alternative income amongst HNWIs in APAC
-
Investment Ideas for 2021: Explore the untapped potential in China Small Companies
-
Dynamism is the name of the game for this global macro strategy
