The FSA Spy market buzz – 6 June 2025
Animal spirits run wild; Franklin Templeton is taking credit; EM banking revolution; Not all luxury is equal; Death of search and the AI machine; George Soros on wins and much more.
HEAD-TO-HEAD: Fidelity vs UBS
FSA compares the Fidelity China Focus Fund and the UBS China Opportunity Fund.
The Fidelity fund has ongoing charges (OCF) of 1.91, while the UBS fund’s OCF is 2.41.
The sector’s OCF median is 2.01.
In terms of fees, the Fidelity fund clearly has an advantage over the UBS fund, Liang said.
“UBS can do a lot more to cut down the fees of the fund,” she said, adding that the fund could cut down on its management and distribution fees.
“UBS’ distribution fees are also above the average”
Related Stories
Promoted Content
-
Federated Hermes SDG Engagement Equity: 2021 H1 Report
-
Don’t get left behind in fixed income
-
Investment Ideas for 2021: Explore the untapped potential in China Small Companies
-
Sustainable Investing in Changing Market Conditions
-
Step up your portfolio by doubling down on sectors set for long-term growth
-
Despite headwinds, ESG continues to perform
-
Smartphones on wheels
-
Who’s afraid of higher interest rates?
-
How ETFs offer an active way to drive sustainable returns
-
Tech WELLcovered | Work reimagined
