Posted inHead To Head

Morgan Stanley vs Templeton

HEAD-TO-HEAD. The global fixed income market is undergoing a period of high volatility. While the European authorities are in final negotiation stages to save Greece from a potential default, the US looks set to hike interest rates sometime this year.
Head to head - knights on a chess board, in blue duotone. Shallow depth of field.

A snapshot of portfolio allocation:

  Morgan fund Templeton fund
Top countries US                                            51.6%

UK                                             4.7%

Spain                                         4.5%

South Korea                               14.7%

Mexico                                      12.7%

Uruguay                                       7.9%

Top

Sectors

Government bonds              24.9%

Mortgage securities             19.0%

Financial securities              13.5%

 

International government/agency (investment grade)                     55.8%

International government/agency

(non-investment)                       10.5%

Sovereign bonds (non-investment grade)                                         9.4%

Top

Currency

US dollar                                  98.3%

British pound                             0.9%

Brazilian real                             0.9%

US dollar                                          72%

South Korean won                        16.5%

Mexican peso                                16.0%

AUM

$1.2bn

$31.6bn

Number of holdings

503

489

Cash

                                   2.7%

16.7%

Source: Fund fact sheets on 31 May

Performance review

 

 

Both funds have outperformed the category of global fixed income products in Singapore universe over various periods until 31 May, as seen in the table below. But the Morgan fund fared better than the Templeton vehicle over one-year and six-month periods.

  1-month 3-month 6-month 1-year
The Morgan fund (-) 0.38% (-) 0.6%       1.3%       0.7%
The Templeton fund       0.03% (-) 0.2% (-) 1.4% (-) 1.2%
Singapore mutual-fixed interest global (-) 0.96% (-) 0.7% (-) 2.4% (-) 5.2%

Source: FE Analytics

Over a three-year period, the Templeton fund outperformed the Morgan vehicle.

  3-year 5-year 10-year
The Morgan fund

19.9%

 

 

The Templeton fund

22.6%

36.3%

139.3%

Singapore mutual-fixed interest global

  5.4%

18.6%

  43.3%

Source: FE Analytics

“In the short-term, the Morgan Stanley fund could have benefited more from the good performance of high yield corporate bonds.

“Over the medium-term, the Templeton fund has benefited due to some of its contrarian strategy plays,” said Ng.

For example, the Templeton fund started betting on Irish debt in the second half of 2011, he explained. 

“Throughout the PIIGS [Portugal, Italy, Ireland, Greece and Spain] financial crisis, yields on Irish debt rose to about 15%. Yields fell to around 4% by the end of 2012,” Ng added.

The falling bond yield boosted the valuation of the portfolio, contributing to higher returns.

In terms of calendar year performance, the Morgan fund outperformed the Templeton fund year-to-date as well as in 2014.  

 

Morgan fund

Templeton fund

Year-to-date

1.1%

0.5%

2014

4.8%

(-) 0.3%

2013

1.8%

3.5%

2012

15.5%

19.8%

Source: FE Analytics

“The majority of the Morgan Stanley fund’s positions were denominated in US dollars. The fund benefitted more [than the Templeton fund] from the dollar rally in 2014,” Ng said.


Part of the Mark Allen Group.