The FSA Spy market buzz – 28 March 2025
JP Morgan Asset Management gets enhanced; Thailand wants some leverage; Natxis is surveying the world; A billionaire here, another there; Business social media lunacy; Andrew Carnegie’s wisdom and more.
HEAD-TO-HEAD: Jupiter versus Schroders
FSA compares two global convertible bond funds: The Jupiter Global Convertibles Fund and the Schroder ISF Global Convertible Bonds.
FEES
The Jupiter fund’s clean share D and I classes have ongoing charges (OCF) of 0.91% and 0.95%, respectively, while the Schroders fund’s clean share class’s OCF is 0.94%, according to Gkeka.
She does not have any concerns over both fund’s fees. In Hong Kong, the two funds are the only SFC-authorised convertible bond funds, according to data from FE Fundinfo.
In terms of their retail share classes, the Jupiter fund is more expensive at 1.72%, compared with the Schroders fund’s OCF of 1.59%, FE Fundinfo data shows.
Related Stories
Promoted Content
-
How can a sustainable approach also ensure you don’t compromise performance?
-
Investors turn to real estate for alternative income
-
Sustainable Investing in Changing Market Conditions
-
Riding the wave of alternative income amongst HNWIs in APAC
-
Accessing India’s tech future
-
Thematic investment series: Innovative transformation cuts across “old” and “new” economy companies
-
Step up your portfolio by doubling down on sectors set for long-term growth
-
Despite headwinds, ESG continues to perform
-
Impact opportunities: investing to limit biodiversity loss
-
M&G Episode Macro shines after tough year
