The FSA Spy market buzz – 19 April 2024
Doom and gloom on China, Peaks and troughs from First Sentier, Ninety-One looks at failure, Lombard Odier’s good news, Corporate jargon hell, Visit cheap Japan and much more.
HEAD-TO-HEAD: Jupiter versus Schroders
FSA compares two global convertible bond funds: The Jupiter Global Convertibles Fund and the Schroder ISF Global Convertible Bonds.
FEES
The Jupiter fund’s clean share D and I classes have ongoing charges (OCF) of 0.91% and 0.95%, respectively, while the Schroders fund’s clean share class’s OCF is 0.94%, according to Gkeka.
She does not have any concerns over both fund’s fees. In Hong Kong, the two funds are the only SFC-authorised convertible bond funds, according to data from FE Fundinfo.
In terms of their retail share classes, the Jupiter fund is more expensive at 1.72%, compared with the Schroders fund’s OCF of 1.59%, FE Fundinfo data shows.
Related Stories
Promoted Content
-
How ETFs offer an active way to drive sustainable returns
-
China bonds: plugging the yield gap
-
Taking a thematic approach to harness disruption
-
The year of living dangerously for income investors
-
Conditions in the high yield market
-
Smartphones on wheels
-
An investment opportunity for the coming decades: the environment
-
Tech WELLcovered | Work reimagined
-
Nuveen broadens income sources via private capital and real assets
-
Who’s afraid of higher interest rates?
