The FSA Spy market buzz – 6 June 2025
Animal spirits run wild; Franklin Templeton is taking credit; EM banking revolution; Not all luxury is equal; Death of search and the AI machine; George Soros on wins and much more.
HEAD-TO-HEAD: JP Morgan AM versus UBS AM
FSA compares two highly-rated China equity funds: the JP Morgan China Fund and the UBS China Opportunity Fund.
Fees
The JP Morgan fund has ongoing charges (OCF) of 1.8%, while the UBS fund’s OCF is 2.4%, according to Liang.
The JP Morgan fund is competitively priced relative to its peers, while the UBS fund is more expensive. The peer average of China equity funds is 1.9%, Liang said.
“We think that UBS AM can bring the fees down of the fund given that the fund has the largest AUM in the category now,” she said.
Related Stories
Promoted Content
-
The year of living dangerously for income investors
-
Accessing Asian 5G innovation: three key portfolio themes
-
Ninety One: Finding opportunities in times of change
-
Sourcing resilient yield and income through short-dated credit
-
Exciting opportunities in AI & Robotics outside of traditional tech
-
Riding the wave of alternative income amongst HNWIs in APAC
-
China bonds: plugging the yield gap
-
China’s post-pandemic growth gathers pace
-
Healthcare’s innovation shifts into high gear
-
Don’t get left behind in fixed income
