The FSA Spy market buzz – 28 March 2025
JP Morgan Asset Management gets enhanced; Thailand wants some leverage; Natxis is surveying the world; A billionaire here, another there; Business social media lunacy; Andrew Carnegie’s wisdom and more.
HEAD-TO-HEAD: JP Morgan AM versus UBS AM
FSA compares two highly-rated China equity funds: the JP Morgan China Fund and the UBS China Opportunity Fund.
Fees
The JP Morgan fund has ongoing charges (OCF) of 1.8%, while the UBS fund’s OCF is 2.4%, according to Liang.
The JP Morgan fund is competitively priced relative to its peers, while the UBS fund is more expensive. The peer average of China equity funds is 1.9%, Liang said.
“We think that UBS AM can bring the fees down of the fund given that the fund has the largest AUM in the category now,” she said.
Related Stories
Promoted Content
-
Ninety One: Finding opportunities in times of change
-
The future of mobility
-
Driving decarbonisation: how to access new forms of alpha
-
Tap into Japan’s post-pandemic growth trends
-
Riding the wave of alternative income amongst HNWIs in APAC
-
Federated Hermes SDG Engagement Equity: 2021 H1 Report
-
Tech WELLcovered | Work reimagined
-
M&G Episode Macro shines after tough year
-
Accessing India’s tech future
-
Healthcare’s innovation shifts into high gear
