The FSA Spy market buzz – 22 November 2024
Dimensional excludes the Middle Kingdom; JP Morgan’s optimistic outlook; Household wealth is rocketing; Schroders is thinking about privates; Ninety One’s pithy AI; German woes and much more.
HEAD-TO-HEAD: JP Morgan AM versus UBS AM
FSA compares two highly-rated China equity funds: the JP Morgan China Fund and the UBS China Opportunity Fund.
Fees
The JP Morgan fund has ongoing charges (OCF) of 1.8%, while the UBS fund’s OCF is 2.4%, according to Liang.
The JP Morgan fund is competitively priced relative to its peers, while the UBS fund is more expensive. The peer average of China equity funds is 1.9%, Liang said.
“We think that UBS AM can bring the fees down of the fund given that the fund has the largest AUM in the category now,” she said.
Related Stories
Promoted Content
-
Accessing India’s tech future
-
China bonds: plugging the yield gap
-
Who’s afraid of higher interest rates?
-
Don’t get left behind in fixed income
-
Eastspring landing page
-
An investment opportunity for the coming decades: the environment
-
Investment Ideas for 2021: Explore the untapped potential in China Small Companies
-
Tech WELLcovered | Work reimagined
-
Step up your portfolio by doubling down on sectors set for long-term growth
-
Dynamism is the name of the game for this global macro strategy
