The FSA Spy market buzz – 4 April 2025
BNY Mellon IM’s conversion; Elusive libertarian investing dream; Eastspring and Vontobel on tariffs; Wisdom of Larry Fink; Has the EU finally seen sense? Price of admission and much more.
HEAD-TO-HEAD: JP Morgan AM versus UBS AM
FSA compares two highly-rated China equity funds: the JP Morgan China Fund and the UBS China Opportunity Fund.
Fees
The JP Morgan fund has ongoing charges (OCF) of 1.8%, while the UBS fund’s OCF is 2.4%, according to Liang.
The JP Morgan fund is competitively priced relative to its peers, while the UBS fund is more expensive. The peer average of China equity funds is 1.9%, Liang said.
“We think that UBS AM can bring the fees down of the fund given that the fund has the largest AUM in the category now,” she said.
Related Stories
Promoted Content
-
Tech WELLcovered | Work reimagined
-
Investment Ideas for 2021: Explore the untapped potential in China Small Companies
-
Ninety One: Finding opportunities in times of change
-
Impact opportunities: investing to limit biodiversity loss
-
Tap into Japan’s post-pandemic growth trends
-
The year of living dangerously for income investors
-
Accessing India’s tech future
-
Fixed income – making ground in ESG as ETFs see rapid growth in AUM
-
Federated Hermes SDG Engagement Equity: 2021 H1 Report
-
Taking a thematic approach to harness disruption
