The FSA Spy market buzz – 19 May 2023
HSBC Private Bank is hiring, an AI ETF comes to market, Nasdaq rally, top performing funds, venture capital woes, Dimon’s ironic short ban, Alibaba’s cloud is freed and much more.
HEAD-TO-HEAD: JP Morgan AM versus UBS AM
FSA compares two highly-rated China equity funds: the JP Morgan China Fund and the UBS China Opportunity Fund.
Fees
The JP Morgan fund has ongoing charges (OCF) of 1.8%, while the UBS fund’s OCF is 2.4%, according to Liang.
The JP Morgan fund is competitively priced relative to its peers, while the UBS fund is more expensive. The peer average of China equity funds is 1.9%, Liang said.
“We think that UBS AM can bring the fees down of the fund given that the fund has the largest AUM in the category now,” she said.
Related Stories
Promoted Content
-
Despite headwinds, ESG continues to perform
-
Impact opportunities: investing to limit biodiversity loss
-
Healthcare’s innovation shifts into high gear
-
Riding the wave of alternative income amongst HNWIs in APAC
-
Who’s afraid of higher interest rates?
-
How ETFs offer an active way to drive sustainable returns
-
Federated Hermes SDG Engagement Equity: 2021 H1 Report
-
The year of living dangerously for income investors
-
Accessing Asian 5G innovation: three key portfolio themes
-
Ninety One: Finding opportunities in times of change
