The FSA Spy market buzz – 13 June 2025
Fund costs are sky high; Jupiter is using its shoes; Shenzhen and Hong Kong cosy up some more; A juicy space IPO; Global currencies and the dollar’s death; Charts from left to right and much more.
HEAD-TO-HEAD: Invesco versus Schroders
FSA compares two highly-rated Greater China equities products: the Invesco Greater China Equity Fund and the Schroder ISF Greater China Fund.
Fees
The Invesco fund’s retail share class ongoing charge figure is 2.01%, which is higher than the 1.85% charged annually by the Schroders fund.
However, both are close to the 1.9% median for the asset class, and Share has “no concerns about either of the fund’s fees, which are acceptable for the range of markets and securities that the managers have to follow”.
Related Stories
Promoted Content
-
Riding the wave of alternative income amongst HNWIs in APAC
-
Turning environmental hopes into investment reality
-
The future of mobility
-
China’s post-pandemic growth gathers pace
-
Who’s afraid of higher interest rates?
-
Accessing Asian 5G innovation: three key portfolio themes
-
Thematic investment series: Innovative transformation cuts across “old” and “new” economy companies
-
Federated Hermes SDG Engagement Equity: 2021 H1 Report
-
Appetite for thematic investments grows amid rates and inflation concerns
-
How ETFs offer an active way to drive sustainable returns
