The FSA Spy market buzz – 4 April 2025
BNY Mellon IM’s conversion; Elusive libertarian investing dream; Eastspring and Vontobel on tariffs; Wisdom of Larry Fink; Has the EU finally seen sense? Price of admission and much more.
HEAD-TO-HEAD: Invesco versus Schroders
FSA compares two highly-rated Greater China equities products: the Invesco Greater China Equity Fund and the Schroder ISF Greater China Fund.
Fees
The Invesco fund’s retail share class ongoing charge figure is 2.01%, which is higher than the 1.85% charged annually by the Schroders fund.
However, both are close to the 1.9% median for the asset class, and Share has “no concerns about either of the fund’s fees, which are acceptable for the range of markets and securities that the managers have to follow”.
Related Stories
Promoted Content
-
The year of living dangerously for income investors
-
Your Questions Answered by Federated Hermes Impact Opportunities
-
Driving decarbonisation: how to access new forms of alpha
-
Accessing Asian 5G innovation: three key portfolio themes
-
Tap into Japan’s post-pandemic growth trends
-
Taking a thematic approach to harness disruption
-
Tech WELLcovered | Work reimagined
-
Dynamism is the name of the game for this global macro strategy
-
Protected: From “FAANG” to “MAMAA” to “Magnificent 7” – what’s in a name?
-
Healthcare’s innovation shifts into high gear
