The FSA Spy market buzz – 9 May 2025
Invesco gets contrarian; Popes and the S&P 500 performance; Jim Cramer’s certainty; Negative yields; AI is everywhere; Natixis considers the next decade; Google’s search woes and much more.
HEAD-TO-HEAD: Franklin Sealand versus Invesco Great Wall
FSA compares two onshore mixed-asset products: The FTS China Prospect Mixed Assets Fund and the Invesco Great Wall Core Competence Mixed Securities Fund.
FEES
Li has no concerns with regard to the funds’ fees, as the total expense ratios of both offerings sit on the fourth quartile of their peer group, indicating a relatively low level of expenses.
In Hong Kong, their ongoing charges (OCF) are at the same level, with the FTS fund’s OCF at 1.76% and the IGW fund’s at 1.75%, according to their key fact statements.
Related Stories
Promoted Content
-
Impact opportunities: investing to limit biodiversity loss
-
Conditions in the high yield market
-
Accessing India’s tech future
-
Driving decarbonisation: how to access new forms of alpha
-
Accessing Asian 5G innovation: three key portfolio themes
-
Investors turn to real estate for alternative income
-
Investment Ideas for 2021: Explore the untapped potential in China Small Companies
-
Unmasking the dividend opportunity
-
Appetite for thematic investments grows amid rates and inflation concerns
-
China bonds: plugging the yield gap
