The FSA Spy market buzz – 22 November 2024
Dimensional excludes the Middle Kingdom; JP Morgan’s optimistic outlook; Household wealth is rocketing; Schroders is thinking about privates; Ninety One’s pithy AI; German woes and much more.
HEAD-TO-HEAD: Fidelity vs Haitong
FSA compares two Asian high yield bond funds with sharply contrasting strategies and profiles: the Fidelity Asian High Yield Fund and the Haitong Asian High Yield Bond Fund.
Fees
The Fidelity fund’s ongoing charge (OCF) is 1.4% which is slightly higher than the 1.38% median for Asian high yield funds, but is justified by its access to the firm’s global resources, Ng said.
Haitong’s 1.17% OCF is perhaps “surprisingly low”, said Ng, because fixed costs are proportionally higher for a smaller fund.
Related Stories
Promoted Content
-
Dynamism is the name of the game for this global macro strategy
-
Exciting opportunities in AI & Robotics outside of traditional tech
-
M&G Episode Macro shines after tough year
-
Impact opportunities: investing to limit biodiversity loss
-
Despite headwinds, ESG continues to perform
-
An investment opportunity for the coming decades: the environment
-
Accessing Asian 5G innovation: three key portfolio themes
-
China bonds: plugging the yield gap
-
Unmasking the dividend opportunity
-
Don’t get left behind in fixed income
