The FSA Spy market buzz – 11 April 2025
Lazard actively looks at Next Gen; Goldman Sachs loves active in small places; Janus Henderson is reassuring; Private equity’s overflowing war chest; Jevons Paradox; Hamlet’s wisdom and much more.
HEAD-TO-HEAD: Fidelity vs Haitong
FSA compares two Asian high yield bond funds with sharply contrasting strategies and profiles: the Fidelity Asian High Yield Fund and the Haitong Asian High Yield Bond Fund.
Fees
The Fidelity fund’s ongoing charge (OCF) is 1.4% which is slightly higher than the 1.38% median for Asian high yield funds, but is justified by its access to the firm’s global resources, Ng said.
Haitong’s 1.17% OCF is perhaps “surprisingly low”, said Ng, because fixed costs are proportionally higher for a smaller fund.
Related Stories
Promoted Content
-
Your Questions Answered by Federated Hermes Impact Opportunities
-
How can a sustainable approach also ensure you don’t compromise performance?
-
From “FAANG” to “MAMAA” to “Magnificent 7” – what’s in a name?
-
Dynamism is the name of the game for this global macro strategy
-
Appetite for thematic investments grows amid rates and inflation concerns
-
Don’t get left behind in fixed income
-
Tap into Japan’s post-pandemic growth trends
-
Thematic investment series: Innovative transformation cuts across “old” and “new” economy companies
-
Accessing Asian 5G innovation: three key portfolio themes
-
Federated Hermes SDG Engagement Equity: 2021 H1 Report
