The FSA Spy market buzz – 16 May 2025
Playing monopoly with ETFs; Eastspring is worrying about loss aversion; Family office explosion; SGX wants more action; The Fear and Greed Index; Retail investors plough on; Deepfake fraud and much more.
HEAD-TO-HEAD: Fidelity versus Stewart
FSA compares two emerging market equity products: the Fidelity Emerging Markets Fund and the Stewart Investors Global Emerging Markets Leaders Fund.
Fees
The clean share class ongoing charges figure (OCF) for the Fidelity fund is 1.08%, which is a little higher than the median for the 66 funds available to Hong Kong and Singapore investors in the emerging market equity sector.
“There is room for improvement,” said Daniels.
“In contrast, the Stewart fund is much cheaper, charging 0.91%, which is towards the lowest end of the range.”
Related Stories
Promoted Content
-
Ninety One: Finding opportunities in times of change
-
Despite headwinds, ESG continues to perform
-
Exciting opportunities in AI & Robotics outside of traditional tech
-
The year of living dangerously for income investors
-
Tap into Japan’s post-pandemic growth trends
-
China’s post-pandemic growth gathers pace
-
Tech WELLcovered | Work reimagined
-
Investors turn to real estate for alternative income
-
Step up your portfolio by doubling down on sectors set for long-term growth
-
Taking a thematic approach to harness disruption
