The FSA Spy market buzz – 13 December 2024
M&G’s positive outlook; Wisdom from Schroders’s podcast; Alliance Bernstein on the power of curiosity; Janus Henderson on responsible AI; China’s retirement revolution; Apple and much more.
HEAD-TO-HEAD: China Merchants versus Penghua
FSA compares two China onshore fixed income products: the CMF Industrial Bond A Fund and the Penghua Industrial Bond Fund.
Fees
The fees for the funds are both at the median level in the “Normal Bond” category. The CMF fund charges a management fee of 0.7% per annum and a custodian fee of 0.2% per annum; the Penghua product charges an annual management fee of 0.6% and a custodian fee of 0.2%.
The total expense ratios of the CMF fund and Penghua fund in 2020 were 0.92% and 0.83% respectively, with both sitting in the middle quintile among their peers, according to Wu.
Related Stories
Promoted Content
-
Investors turn to real estate for alternative income
-
An investment opportunity for the coming decades: the environment
-
Driving decarbonisation: how to access new forms of alpha
-
Accessing Asian 5G innovation: three key portfolio themes
-
Sustainable Investing in Changing Market Conditions
-
Thematic investment series: Innovative transformation cuts across “old” and “new” economy companies
-
The year of living dangerously for income investors
-
Tech WELLcovered | Work reimagined
-
Conditions in the high yield market
-
Who’s afraid of higher interest rates?
