The FSA Spy market buzz – 11 April 2025
Lazard actively looks at Next Gen; Goldman Sachs loves active in small places; Janus Henderson is reassuring; Private equity’s overflowing war chest; Jevons Paradox; Hamlet’s wisdom and much more.
HEAD-TO-HEAD: Aberdeen Standard versus MFS IM
FSA compares two European equity products: the Aberdeen Standard Sicav II – European Smaller Companies Fund and the MFS European Smaller Companies Fund.
FEES
The ongoing charges (OCF) of the retail share class of the Aberdeen Standard fund is 1.93%, while the OCF of the MFS fund is 2%, according to their key fact statements.
The Aberdeen Standard fund’s OCF is in line with its peers, while the MFS fund is more expensive. The peer median for European small/mid-cap funds sold in Hong Kong is 1.93%, according to FE Fundinfo.
Related Stories
Promoted Content
-
Healthcare’s innovation shifts into high gear
-
Appetite for thematic investments grows amid rates and inflation concerns
-
Unmasking the dividend opportunity
-
How ETFs offer an active way to drive sustainable returns
-
Don’t get left behind in fixed income
-
Tap into Japan’s post-pandemic growth trends
-
Sustainable Investing in Changing Market Conditions
-
Step up your portfolio by doubling down on sectors set for long-term growth
-
Your Questions Answered by Federated Hermes Impact Opportunities
-
Despite headwinds, ESG continues to perform
