The FSA Spy market buzz – 13 December 2024
M&G’s positive outlook; Wisdom from Schroders’s podcast; Alliance Bernstein on the power of curiosity; Janus Henderson on responsible AI; China’s retirement revolution; Apple and much more.
HEAD-TO-HEAD: JP Morgan vs Schroders
FSA compares two China mixed asset products — the JP Morgan China Income Fund and the Schroders China Asset Income Fund.
The two featured funds have charges higher than the peer median. The JP Morgan fund has ongoing charges (OCF) of 2.01% compared to 1.91% for the Schroders fund.
The Asia-Pacific multi-asset sector’s average OCF is 1.62%, according to FE data.
Ng, however, said that the cost of either fund is not overly expensive, adding that it is difficult to compare these funds to the broader multi-asset sector given there are not many China-focused multi-asset funds available in the market.
Related Stories
Promoted Content
-
Thematic investment series: Innovative transformation cuts across “old” and “new” economy companies
-
Driving decarbonisation: how to access new forms of alpha
-
The future of mobility
-
Eastspring landing page
-
Riding the wave of alternative income amongst HNWIs in APAC
-
Ninety One: Finding opportunities in times of change
-
Turning environmental hopes into investment reality
-
Don’t get left behind in fixed income
-
Appetite for thematic investments grows amid rates and inflation concerns
-
M&G Episode Macro shines after tough year
