Posted inHead To Head

HEAD-TO-HEAD: Invesco vs JP Morgan

Fund Selector Asia compares the Invesco Greater China Equity Fund with the JP Morgan Greater China Fund.

By comparison, the JP Morgan team assumes that stocks that are underperforming could perform well in the future. The team, led by Howard Wang, adopts a contrarian approach when selecting stocks. They prefer companies that are out-of-favour, but still retain core competencies and are expected to post a turnaround performance within 12 months.

Wang concentrates on three regions: China, Hong Kong and Taiwan. The team uses different approaches in each region. For China, the team uses a combination of the top-down and the bottom-up approach. In the case of Hong Kong, Wang leans solely on the top-down approach while for Taiwan, he uses the bottom-up approach.

“For Hong Kong, the financial market is matured and listed stocks can be affected by macroeconomic factors. In this case, a top-down approach works better. For Taiwan, the team conducts a lot more ground research, as there are many more small-cap companies that offer value. The underlying fundamentals of these companies drive performance, not macroeconomic factors. In the case of China, a mixed approach is needed as Chinese companies are affected by both macroeconomic factors and the central government’s policies,” Ng explained.

The JP Morgan fund, which usually holds 50-70 stocks, is less concentrated than Invesco’s. In addition, its sector focus is different. Wang prefers financials and industrials as opposed to consumer-based sectors. 

A snapshot of portfolio allocation:

Part of the Mark Allen Group.