The FSA Spy market buzz – 30 May 2025
Korean AI-driven investing, The wisdom of Nvidia, Goldman Sachs and active good news, The sheer size of the top ten, Ferris Bueller and Trump’s tariffs, A trillion here - a trillion there, and much more.
HEAD-TO-HEAD: Fidelity vs UBS
FSA compares the Fidelity China Focus Fund and the UBS China Opportunity Fund.
The Fidelity fund has ongoing charges (OCF) of 1.91, while the UBS fund’s OCF is 2.41.
The sector’s OCF median is 2.01.
In terms of fees, the Fidelity fund clearly has an advantage over the UBS fund, Liang said.
“UBS can do a lot more to cut down the fees of the fund,” she said, adding that the fund could cut down on its management and distribution fees.
“UBS’ distribution fees are also above the average”
Related Stories
Promoted Content
-
Your Questions Answered by Federated Hermes Impact Opportunities
-
Nuveen broadens income sources via private capital and real assets
-
An investment opportunity for the coming decades: the environment
-
Investment Ideas for 2021: Explore the untapped potential in China Small Companies
-
Thematic investment series: Innovative transformation cuts across “old” and “new” economy companies
-
Impact opportunities: investing to limit biodiversity loss
-
Turning environmental hopes into investment reality
-
M&G Episode Macro shines after tough year
-
Federated Hermes SDG Engagement Equity: 2021 H1 Report
-
Smartphones on wheels
