The FSA Spy market buzz – 28 March 2025
JP Morgan Asset Management gets enhanced; Thailand wants some leverage; Natxis is surveying the world; A billionaire here, another there; Business social media lunacy; Andrew Carnegie’s wisdom and more.
HEAD-TO-HEAD: Fidelity vs UBS
FSA compares the Fidelity China Focus Fund and the UBS China Opportunity Fund.
The Fidelity fund has ongoing charges (OCF) of 1.91, while the UBS fund’s OCF is 2.41.
The sector’s OCF median is 2.01.
In terms of fees, the Fidelity fund clearly has an advantage over the UBS fund, Liang said.
“UBS can do a lot more to cut down the fees of the fund,” she said, adding that the fund could cut down on its management and distribution fees.
“UBS’ distribution fees are also above the average”
Related Stories
Promoted Content
-
Accessing India’s tech future
-
Accessing Asian 5G innovation: three key portfolio themes
-
Riding the wave of alternative income amongst HNWIs in APAC
-
Unmasking the dividend opportunity
-
Taking a thematic approach to harness disruption
-
Healthcare’s innovation shifts into high gear
-
China’s post-pandemic growth gathers pace
-
M&G Episode Macro shines after tough year
-
Who’s afraid of higher interest rates?
-
Tech WELLcovered | Work reimagined
