Posted inNews

HEAD-TO-HEAD: Stewart Investors versus Templeton

FSA compares two emerging markets equity products: the Stewart Investors Global Emerging Markets Leaders Fund and the Templeton Emerging Markets Fund.
by Rupert Walker

123456

FEES

Morningstar emphasises that it is critical to evaluate expenses, because they come directly out of returns.

The firm’s enhanced ratings framework, set out in 2019, places a greater emphasis on fees and expected net benchmark relative performance.

The median ongoing charges figure (OCF) for emerging market equity funds available to Hong Kong retail investors is 1.8%, according to FE Fundinfo.

The OCF for the retail share class of the Stewart fund is 1.57%, which is within Morningstar’s second-cheapest quintile.

“The fund should be able to deliver positive alpha relative to the category benchmark index, which explains its Morningstar analyst rating of Silver,” said Daniels.

In contrast, the OCF for the Templeton fund at 2%, ranks it in Morningstar costliest quintile.

“Such high fees stack the odds heavily against investors,” said Daniels.

As a result, he is sceptical that the retail share class can deliver positive alpha relative to the category benchmark index, hence the Morningstar analyst rating of Neutral.

123456

Related Stories

FSA SPY

The FSA Spy market buzz – 12 April 2024

Equity that is not Kool, Abrdn’s fund closures, Lombard Odier loves private markets, China’s ugly debt graph, Mountainous interest rate analogies, US housing costs, Gold smuggling, Advertising and much more.

Part of the Mark Allen Group.