The FSA Spy market buzz – 13 December 2024
M&G’s positive outlook; Wisdom from Schroders’s podcast; Alliance Bernstein on the power of curiosity; Janus Henderson on responsible AI; China’s retirement revolution; Apple and much more.
HEAD-TO-HEAD: Fidelity versus Income Partners
FSA compares two Asia high-yield products: Fidelity Funds – Asia High Yield A and Income Partners Managed Volatility High Yield Bond Fund
Fees
Income Partners is the more expensive of the two funds, charging 1.73% compared with 1.36% for Fidelity.
“Generally, fees are high in this asset class in Asia but also globally. This is a challenging market with a good opportunity to deliver alpha across a range of markets, where information is relatively harder to obtain and interpret. Income Partners has a particularly high fee but has generated some alpha over time,” said Poole.
Related Stories
Promoted Content
-
M&G Episode Macro shines after tough year
-
Fixed income – making ground in ESG as ETFs see rapid growth in AUM
-
Turning environmental hopes into investment reality
-
Ninety One: Finding opportunities in times of change
-
How can a sustainable approach also ensure you don’t compromise performance?
-
Sustainable Investing in Changing Market Conditions
-
Taking a thematic approach to harness disruption
-
Thematic investment series: Innovative transformation cuts across “old” and “new” economy companies
-
How ETFs offer an active way to drive sustainable returns
-
Riding the wave of alternative income amongst HNWIs in APAC
