The FSA Spy market buzz – 13 December 2024
M&G’s positive outlook; Wisdom from Schroders’s podcast; Alliance Bernstein on the power of curiosity; Janus Henderson on responsible AI; China’s retirement revolution; Apple and much more.
HEAD-TO-HEAD: Aberdeen Standard versus MFS IM
FSA compares two European equity products: the Aberdeen Standard Sicav II – European Smaller Companies Fund and the MFS European Smaller Companies Fund.
FEES
The ongoing charges (OCF) of the retail share class of the Aberdeen Standard fund is 1.93%, while the OCF of the MFS fund is 2%, according to their key fact statements.
The Aberdeen Standard fund’s OCF is in line with its peers, while the MFS fund is more expensive. The peer median for European small/mid-cap funds sold in Hong Kong is 1.93%, according to FE Fundinfo.
Related Stories
Promoted Content
-
Tech WELLcovered | Work reimagined
-
How ETFs offer an active way to drive sustainable returns
-
Who’s afraid of higher interest rates?
-
Sustainable Investing in Changing Market Conditions
-
Fixed income – making ground in ESG as ETFs see rapid growth in AUM
-
Appetite for thematic investments grows amid rates and inflation concerns
-
How can a sustainable approach also ensure you don’t compromise performance?
-
M&G Episode Macro shines after tough year
-
The future of mobility
-
Federated Hermes SDG Engagement Equity: 2021 H1 Report
