The FSA Spy market buzz – 4 April 2025
BNY Mellon IM’s conversion; Elusive libertarian investing dream; Eastspring and Vontobel on tariffs; Wisdom of Larry Fink; Has the EU finally seen sense? Price of admission and much more.
HEAD-TO-HEAD: Aberdeen Standard versus MFS IM
FSA compares two European equity products: the Aberdeen Standard Sicav II – European Smaller Companies Fund and the MFS European Smaller Companies Fund.
FEES
The ongoing charges (OCF) of the retail share class of the Aberdeen Standard fund is 1.93%, while the OCF of the MFS fund is 2%, according to their key fact statements.
The Aberdeen Standard fund’s OCF is in line with its peers, while the MFS fund is more expensive. The peer median for European small/mid-cap funds sold in Hong Kong is 1.93%, according to FE Fundinfo.
Related Stories
Promoted Content
-
M&G Episode Macro shines after tough year
-
China’s post-pandemic growth gathers pace
-
Taking a thematic approach to harness disruption
-
Investment Ideas for 2021: Explore the untapped potential in China Small Companies
-
Healthcare’s innovation shifts into high gear
-
Tap into Japan’s post-pandemic growth trends
-
Driving decarbonisation: how to access new forms of alpha
-
Riding the wave of alternative income amongst HNWIs in APAC
-
Step up your portfolio by doubling down on sectors set for long-term growth
-
Accessing India’s tech future
