The FSA Spy market buzz – 6 June 2025
Animal spirits run wild; Franklin Templeton is taking credit; EM banking revolution; Not all luxury is equal; Death of search and the AI machine; George Soros on wins and much more.
HEAD-TO-HEAD: Aberdeen Standard versus MFS IM
FSA compares two European equity products: the Aberdeen Standard Sicav II – European Smaller Companies Fund and the MFS European Smaller Companies Fund.
FEES
The ongoing charges (OCF) of the retail share class of the Aberdeen Standard fund is 1.93%, while the OCF of the MFS fund is 2%, according to their key fact statements.
The Aberdeen Standard fund’s OCF is in line with its peers, while the MFS fund is more expensive. The peer median for European small/mid-cap funds sold in Hong Kong is 1.93%, according to FE Fundinfo.
Related Stories
Promoted Content
-
Ninety One: Finding opportunities in times of change
-
How can a sustainable approach also ensure you don’t compromise performance?
-
Taking a thematic approach to harness disruption
-
China bonds: plugging the yield gap
-
Your Questions Answered by Federated Hermes Impact Opportunities
-
Impact opportunities: investing to limit biodiversity loss
-
Thematic investment series: Innovative transformation cuts across “old” and “new” economy companies
-
Riding the wave of alternative income amongst HNWIs in APAC
-
Nuveen broadens income sources via private capital and real assets
-
Federated Hermes SDG Engagement Equity: 2021 H1 Report
